The line between fiction and non-fiction in the financial world is almost invisible when you get down to it.
The public is mad. Their money was taken by Republicans and given to big rich bankers while those same rich bankers were kicking the same people that bailed them out, out of their homes!
The Republicans didn't even put in place how that money was suppose to be used so these rich bankers and brokerage firms paid their CEOs and traders millions in bonuses!
Where was the outrage and the Tea Party meetings about that? No. The Tea Party has zero credibility and is nothing more than a Republican party funded subsidiary. Stupid truck driving, gun holding, yahoo's with barely a high school education are easy to manipulate. Fortunately, the majority of the public doesn't buy into the whole Republican backed Tea Party movement. A good example is that the Central Valley in California is considered a Republican strong-hold. When the Tea Party came to town, only about 7,000 people out of a population of over 1 million showed up. That's less than 1%! And that's in a supposedly strong Republican area that George Bush visited twice when running for office and that Sean Hannity has been to several times.
So people are mad and are disillusioned in the system. Rob from the poor and give to the rich, and hope that the rich will continue to pay slave labor like wages to a few more people out of the generosity and kindness of their hearts. Whatever. I guess trickle down economics made popular by Ronald Reagan is now a bunch of BS. Trickle down economics became piss on you economics as taxpayers had money taken from them, and were kicked out of their homes at the same time.
The days of Republican appointed Goldman Sachs CEO Hank Paulson as U.S. Treasury Secretary and cleaning out the taxpayer is over.
We have a new administration now with a mandate to restore faith and confidence in the broken system created by the Republicans for the last 8 years. An administration that is by and for the people, not the rich and not the big corporations. And even though the Republicans have given their all to block all Democrat legislation from passing and even Obama cabinet appointees, the hobbled and half broken wheel of justice continues to turn, barely.
Reporter Erin Burnett, Jim Cramer, and Sylvian Raynes got into it on CNBC.
So the SEC busts Goldman Sachs for fraud, and Jim Cramer goes on national television to defend them.
Both Erin Burnett and Jim Cramer basically shot down Sylvian Raynes for saying the truth, that Jim Cramer has a beneficial relationship with Goldman Sachs.
Erin Burnett booted Sylvian Raynes off her show for saying that Cramer was a spokesman for Goldman Sachs. Cramer acted all pissed off at Sylvian's comments.
Here's what CNBC didn't tell you. Both Erin Burnett and Jim Cramer were at one time employees for Goldman Sachs! Erin Burnett began her career in 1998 as a financial analyst for Goldman Sachs in their investment banking division, where she worked on mergers and acquisitions and corporate finance. Jim Cramer was hired in 1984 as a stock broker in Goldman Sachs' Private Wealth Management division. Cramer's success in this position led him to found his own hedge fund, Cramer & Co. (later Cramer, Berkowitz, & Co.), in 1987. In fact, Jim Cramer suggests in several of his books that he owes everything that he is today from Goldman Sachs giving him a chance in the business when he was a nobody and teaching him the ropes.
If Sylvian Raynes' comment was so crazy, then why didn't Cramer argue the Goldman Sachs comment with Sylvian? Why didn't Cramer ask Sylvian to prove the connection between himself and Goldman Sachs? If his comments really were that crazy, Cramer could have embarrassed this guy in front of everybody. Instead, Erin Burnett shut down Sylvian from even talking then booted him off her show over the commercial break.
Sylvian speaks unbiased information and he is kicked from the show. But biased Erin Burnett and Jim Cramer, as former Goldman Sachs employees, are made to look like they are the ones who are unbiased.
Check out this shameful bit of reporting.
Is Cramer an unbiased person commenting on Goldman Sachs? Look at the information below then you decide.
Cramer's Lightning Round (1/22/10)
"Goldman is a great company...I am not selling it..."
Cramer on BloggingStocks: When to buy Goldman Sachs (2/19/2008) http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-when-to-buy-goldman-sachs/
"Goldman's a strange bird here. It did a big private equity fund raise at the wrong time but I don't believe it spent much of it. It didn't do a lot of bad mortgages but it did do a lot of corporate debt to take companies private and that's what they are hung on. Goldman's beginning to trade as if fixed income is going to go away so if it hasn't you could have a run. But I am adamant that there can't be a run until everyone who is following the company gets in line and then you can, after the cuts, have an upside surprise."
Cramer: Goldman Sachs is an "Unbelievable Buy" (11/1/2008)
"Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) shares continued their fall despite a positive recommendation by CNBC's Jim Cramer on his Mad Money Lightning Round. The hedge fund manager turned television star believes that shares are sharply undervalued and called the stock an "unbelievable buy" at $40 per share less than Warren Buffett's investment. Cramer insists that the concerns that Goldman cannot reinvent itself are unfounded and recommended investors pick up shares at $75 per share."
Cramer Helps Goldman Sachs Upgrade Of The Natural Gas Sector (3/1/10) http://seekingalpha.com/article/191369-cramer-s-stop-trading-goldman-sachs-s-natural-upgrade-3-1-10
Cramer thinks Goldman Sachs's upgrade of the natural gas sector is an indication there might be some legislation in the works to promote further development of the alternative fuel; "you don’t make this call, unless you have some conviction.” South West Energy (SWN) is the largest pure play in natural gas that can still "be acquired or nibbled at."
The line between fiction and non-fiction in the financial world is almost invisible when you get down to it.
The public is mad. Their money was taken by Republicans and given to big rich bankers while those same rich bankers were kicking the same people that bailed them out, out of their homes!
The Republicans didn't even put in place how that money was suppose to be used so these rich bankers and brokerage firms paid their CEOs and traders millions in bonuses!
Where was the outrage and the Tea Party meetings about that? No. The Tea Party has zero credibility and is nothing more than a Republican party funded subsidiary. Stupid truck driving, gun holding, yahoo's with barely a high school education are easy to manipulate. Fortunately, the majority of the public doesn't buy into the whole Republican backed Tea Party movement. A good example is that the Central Valley in California is considered a Republican strong-hold. When the Tea Party came to town, only about 7,000 people out of a population of over 1 million showed up. That's less than 1%! And that's in a supposedly strong Republican area that George Bush visited twice when running for office and that Sean Hannity has been to several times.
So people are mad and are disillusioned in the system. Rob from the poor and give to the rich, and hope that the rich will continue to pay slave labor like wages to a few more people out of the generosity and kindness of their hearts. Whatever. I guess trickle down economics made popular by Ronald Reagan is now a bunch of BS. Trickle down economics became piss on you economics as taxpayers had money taken from them, and were kicked out of their homes at the same time.
The days of Republican appointed Goldman Sachs CEO Hank Paulson as U.S. Treasury Secretary and cleaning out the taxpayer is over.
We have a new administration now with a mandate to restore faith and confidence in the broken system created by the Republicans for the last 8 years. An administration that is by and for the people, not the rich and not the big corporations. And even though the Republicans have given their all to block all Democrat legislation from passing and even Obama cabinet appointees, the hobbled and half broken wheel of justice continues to turn, barely.
Reporter Erin Burnett, Jim Cramer, and Sylvian Raynes got into it on CNBC.
So the SEC busts Goldman Sachs for fraud, and Jim Cramer goes on national television to defend them.
Both Erin Burnett and Jim Cramer basically shot down Sylvian Raynes for saying the truth, that Jim Cramer has a beneficial relationship with Goldman Sachs.
Erin Burnett booted Sylvian Raynes off her show for saying that Cramer was a spokesman for Goldman Sachs. Cramer acted all pissed off at Sylvian's comments.
Here's what CNBC didn't tell you. Both Erin Burnett and Jim Cramer were at one time employees for Goldman Sachs! Erin Burnett began her career in 1998 as a financial analyst for Goldman Sachs in their investment banking division, where she worked on mergers and acquisitions and corporate finance. Jim Cramer was hired in 1984 as a stock broker in Goldman Sachs' Private Wealth Management division. Cramer's success in this position led him to found his own hedge fund, Cramer & Co. (later Cramer, Berkowitz, & Co.), in 1987. In fact, Jim Cramer suggests in several of his books that he owes everything that he is today from Goldman Sachs giving him a chance in the business when he was a nobody and teaching him the ropes.
If Sylvian Raynes' comment was so crazy, then why didn't Cramer argue the Goldman Sachs comment with Sylvian? Why didn't Cramer ask Sylvian to prove the connection between himself and Goldman Sachs? If his comments really were that crazy, Cramer could have embarrassed this guy in front of everybody. Instead, Erin Burnett shut down Sylvian from even talking then booted him off her show over the commercial break.
Sylvian speaks unbiased information and he is kicked from the show. But biased Erin Burnett and Jim Cramer, as former Goldman Sachs employees, are made to look like they are the ones who are unbiased.
Check out this shameful bit of reporting.
Is Cramer an unbiased person commenting on Goldman Sachs? Look at the information below then you decide.
Cramer's Lightning Round (1/22/10)
"Goldman is a great company...I am not selling it..."
Jim Cramer Video: Time to Buy Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
http://maddmoney.net/jim-cramer-video-time-to-buy-goldman-sachs-group-inc-nysegs-jpmorgan-chase-co-nysejpm/
Cramer on BloggingStocks: When to buy Goldman Sachs (2/19/2008)
http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-when-to-buy-goldman-sachs/
"Goldman's a strange bird here. It did a big private equity fund raise at the wrong time but I don't believe it spent much of it. It didn't do a lot of bad mortgages but it did do a lot of corporate debt to take companies private and that's what they are hung on. Goldman's beginning to trade as if fixed income is going to go away so if it hasn't you could have a run. But I am adamant that there can't be a run until everyone who is following the company gets in line and then you can, after the cuts, have an upside surprise."
Cramer: Goldman Sachs is an "Unbelievable Buy" (11/1/2008)
"Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) shares continued their fall despite a positive recommendation by CNBC's Jim Cramer on his Mad Money Lightning Round. The hedge fund manager turned television star believes that shares are sharply undervalued and called the stock an "unbelievable buy" at $40 per share less than Warren Buffett's investment. Cramer insists that the concerns that Goldman cannot reinvent itself are unfounded and recommended investors pick up shares at $75 per share."
Cramer Helps Goldman Sachs Upgrade Of The Natural Gas Sector (3/1/10)
http://seekingalpha.com/article/191369-cramer-s-stop-trading-goldman-sachs-s-natural-upgrade-3-1-10
Cramer thinks Goldman Sachs's upgrade of the natural gas sector is an indication there might be some legislation in the works to promote further development of the alternative fuel; "you don’t make this call, unless you have some conviction.” South West Energy (SWN) is the largest pure play in natural gas that can still "be acquired or nibbled at."
The line between fiction and non-fiction in the financial world is almost invisible when you get down to it.
The public is mad. Their money was taken by Republicans and given to big rich bankers while those same rich bankers were kicking the same people that bailed them out, out of their homes!
The Republicans didn't even put in place how that money was suppose to be used so these rich bankers and brokerage firms paid their CEOs and traders millions in bonuses!
Where was the outrage and the Tea Party meetings about that? No. The Tea Party has zero credibility and is nothing more than a Republican party funded subsidiary. Stupid truck driving, gun holding, yahoo's with barely a high school education are easy to manipulate. Fortunately, the majority of the public doesn't buy into the whole Republican backed Tea Party movement. A good example is that the Central Valley in California is considered a Republican strong-hold. When the Tea Party came to town, only about 7,000 people out of a population of over 1 million showed up. That's less than 1%! And that's in a supposedly strong Republican area that George Bush visited twice when running for office and that Sean Hannity has been to several times.
So people are mad and are disillusioned in the system. Rob from the poor and give to the rich, and hope that the rich will continue to pay slave labor like wages to a few more people out of the generosity and kindness of their hearts. Whatever. I guess trickle down economics made popular by Ronald Reagan is now a bunch of BS. Trickle down economics became piss on you economics as taxpayers had money taken from them, and were kicked out of their homes at the same time.
The days of Republican appointed Goldman Sachs CEO Hank Paulson as U.S. Treasury Secretary and cleaning out the taxpayer is over.
We have a new administration now with a mandate to restore faith and confidence in the broken system created by the Republicans for the last 8 years. An administration that is by and for the people, not the rich and not the big corporations. And even though the Republicans have given their all to block all Democrat legislation from passing and even Obama cabinet appointees, the hobbled and half broken wheel of justice continues to turn, barely.
Reporter Erin Burnett, Jim Cramer, and Sylvian Raynes got into it on CNBC.
So the SEC busts Goldman Sachs for fraud, and Jim Cramer goes on national television to defend them.
Both Erin Burnett and Jim Cramer basically shot down Sylvian Raynes for saying the truth, that Jim Cramer has a beneficial relationship with Goldman Sachs.
Erin Burnett booted Sylvian Raynes off her show for saying that Cramer was a spokesman for Goldman Sachs. Cramer acted all pissed off at Sylvian's comments.
Here's what CNBC didn't tell you. Both Erin Burnett and Jim Cramer were at one time employees for Goldman Sachs! Erin Burnett began her career in 1998 as a financial analyst for Goldman Sachs in their investment banking division, where she worked on mergers and acquisitions and corporate finance. Jim Cramer was hired in 1984 as a stock broker in Goldman Sachs' Private Wealth Management division. Cramer's success in this position led him to found his own hedge fund, Cramer & Co. (later Cramer, Berkowitz, & Co.), in 1987. In fact, Jim Cramer suggests in several of his books that he owes everything that he is today from Goldman Sachs giving him a chance in the business when he was a nobody and teaching him the ropes.
If Sylvian Raynes' comment was so crazy, then why didn't Cramer argue the Goldman Sachs comment with Sylvian? Why didn't Cramer ask Sylvian to prove the connection between himself and Goldman Sachs? If his comments really were that crazy, Cramer could have embarrassed this guy in front of everybody. Instead, Erin Burnett shut down Sylvian from even talking then booted him off her show over the commercial break.
Sylvian speaks unbiased information and he is kicked from the show. But biased Erin Burnett and Jim Cramer, as former Goldman Sachs employees, are made to look like they are the ones who are unbiased.
Check out this shameful bit of reporting.
Is Cramer an unbiased person commenting on Goldman Sachs? Look at the information below then you decide.
Cramer's Lightning Round (1/22/10)
"Goldman is a great company...I am not selling it..."
Jim Cramer Video: Time to Buy Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
http://maddmoney.net/jim-cramer-video-time-to-buy-goldman-sachs-group-inc-nysegs-jpmorgan-chase-co-nysejpm/
Cramer on BloggingStocks: When to buy Goldman Sachs (2/19/2008)
http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-when-to-buy-goldman-sachs/
"Goldman's a strange bird here. It did a big private equity fund raise at the wrong time but I don't believe it spent much of it. It didn't do a lot of bad mortgages but it did do a lot of corporate debt to take companies private and that's what they are hung on. Goldman's beginning to trade as if fixed income is going to go away so if it hasn't you could have a run. But I am adamant that there can't be a run until everyone who is following the company gets in line and then you can, after the cuts, have an upside surprise."
Cramer: Goldman Sachs is an "Unbelievable Buy" (11/1/2008)
"Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) shares continued their fall despite a positive recommendation by CNBC's Jim Cramer on his Mad Money Lightning Round. The hedge fund manager turned television star believes that shares are sharply undervalued and called the stock an "unbelievable buy" at $40 per share less than Warren Buffett's investment. Cramer insists that the concerns that Goldman cannot reinvent itself are unfounded and recommended investors pick up shares at $75 per share."
Cramer Helps Goldman Sachs Upgrade Of The Natural Gas Sector (3/1/10)
http://seekingalpha.com/article/191369-cramer-s-stop-trading-goldman-sachs-s-natural-upgrade-3-1-10
Cramer thinks Goldman Sachs's upgrade of the natural gas sector is an indication there might be some legislation in the works to promote further development of the alternative fuel; "you don’t make this call, unless you have some conviction.” South West Energy (SWN) is the largest pure play in natural gas that can still "be acquired or nibbled at."
Stocks Above I Currently Hold In My Own Trading Account: Long LIFE
Guerilla Trader Quote
“In October 2000, the Institutions were publishing positive fundamental data and analysis about Cisco's future. Just a few months later, Cisco announced it would lay off 17 percent of its workforce. Cisco stock fell from $45 to $11. Industry analysts, newsletter writers, politicians, and others often have connections to the stocks they recommend. Don’t be fooled by a clever mixture of the facts they wish you to hear and the opinions they want you to believe. Make your own decisions!”
Copyright 2009-2011 GuerillaStockTrading.com All rights reserved. No part or article on this website may be copied or duplicated without written consent from GuerillaStockTrading.com and Confab Publishing. Disclaimer: This Web site is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information on the subject of personal finances. It is provided with the understanding that neither the author nor the publisher is engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional services by providing this Web site. The authors and publisher shall not be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential or other damages. As each individual situation is unique, questions relevant to personal finances and specific to the individual should be addressed to an appropriate professional to ensure that the situation has been carefully and appropriately evaluated. This blog is for information and entertainment purposes only. Under no circumstances does this information represent a recommendation to buy or sell securities or any other type of investment instruments. See a licensed broker for investment advice.
The line between fiction and non-fiction in the financial world is almost invisible when you get down to it.
Guerilla Stock Trading University